Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Sample ultra low line expenses

These are final expenses for a SAG Ultra Low Budget feature shot recently over 22 days in Los Angeles. These are the expenses of just production costs (and a bit of preproduction expenses which are essentially some scouting costs, etc). The total budget here is $91,000. Salaries for cast were $100 a day as per the SAG ULB contract, and $75-$100 for crew. We also had about six full time volunteers helping out. Our camera was a Red 1 and our G&E package was supplied by the gaffer. We used a payroll service that charged a flat fee. We paid extras $25 a day. We paid overtime (time + 1/2) at 12 hours.

This may help you as your considering a potential budget. You can tell that there were no stunts or FX involved in this project and that most wardrobe was provided by talent.






ACTUAL

PRUDOCER UNIT

1202
PRODUCER
3500
1285
OTHER COSTS
140

TOTAL
3640


DIRECTOR
1301
DIRECTOR
2500




CAST

1401
STARS & LEADS
3798.86
1402
SUPPORTING CAST
2605.63

TOTAL
6404.49




FRINGES

1999
FRINGES
2173.77

TOTAL
2173.77




PRODUCTION STAFF

2003
1ST ASSITANT DIRECTOR
2318.75
2006
SCRIPT SUPERVISOR
1514.07

TOTAL
3832.82




EXTRA TALENT

2100
EXTRA TALENT
225

TOTAL
225




SET DESIGN

2201
PRODUCTION DESIGNER
2518.75

TOTAL
2518.75


SET OPERATIONS

2502
KEY GRIP
2418.75

TOTAL
2418.75




SET DRESSING AND PROPS

2716
SET DRESSING PURCHASES
500
2717
SET DRESSING RENTALS
818.14
2816
PROPERTY
316.26

TOTAL
1634.4




WARDROBE

3001
COSTUME DESIGNER
1889.07
3016
PURCHASES
266.19

TOTAL
2155.26




MAKEUP/HAIR

3101
KEY MAKE UP ARTIST
2318.75
3103
ADDL MAKE UP ARTIST
500
3106
ADDL HAIRSTYLIST
400
3177
BOX RENTALS
220

TOTAL
3438.75




ELECTRICAL

3201
GAFFER
2618.75
3217
RENTALS
7000
3285
MISC EXPENSE
542.67

TOTAL
10161.42




CAMERA

3301
DIRECTOR OF PHOTOGRAPHY
2168.75
3303
1ST ASSISTANT CAMERA
2487.5
3316
PURCHASES
855.02
3317
RENTALS
9705

TOTAL
15216.27




SOUND

3401
MIXER
2300
3402
BOOM
2200
3416
PURCHASES
210.11
3417
RENTALS
2280
3477
BOX RENTAL
800
3486
LOSS & DAMAGE
40

TOTAL
7830.11




TRANSPORTATION

3544
GAS/OIL
848.61

TOTAL
848.61




LOCATIONS

3601
PERMIT FEES
2886
3602
LOCATION SITE RENTALS
6219
3611
CATERED MEALS
5187.53
3612
CRAFT SERVICE TABLE
2673.35
3613
PARKING
103.75
3631
MISCELLANEOUS
480.66
3650
LOCATION SITE RESTORATION
325
3687
WRAP PARTY EXPENSES
345.22

TOTAL
18220.51




SECOND UNIT

4033
CAMERA
243.76
4085
OTHER COSTS
251.22

TOTAL
494.98




PREPRODUCTION EXPENSES

4306
PREPRODUCTION GENERAL
188.53

TOTAL
188.53


INSURANCE

6701
INSURANCE PACKAGE
4013

TOTAL
4013

GENERAL EXPENSES

6802
PAYROLL EXPENSES
700
6807
LEGAL PRODUCTION
800
6812
OFFICE SUPPLIES
302.17

TOTAL
1802.17




ADDITIONAL

4800
DATA COMPOSITING
1250




TOTALS
90967.59


Friday, September 30, 2011

Working for free... thoughts about unpaid internships

Below is an article that appeared today in The Wrap about two interns who are suing because they weren't paid for the hours they worked on the feature film THE BLACK SWAN. I have seen this discussion before and I think it's crazy. There are many people very eager to work on a film shoot. If I wasn't allowed to use unpaid labor I certainly would NEVER hire someone who hadn't worked on a film shoot before. The best way to start in the film business is to be willing to work for free. I did... when I was 30 by the way (married, with a couple of kids and a house mortgage). It's how you learn. Why would someone hire someone who hasn't learned by being on an actual shoot. If you're like me and making films for under $100,000, or under $30,000, it's impossible to pay everyone... it's difficult to pay anyone, actually.

I have used unpaid interns (I have relied on unpaid interns) on every project I've been involved in. I get a few extra hands to help things go a bit more smoothly.

Here's what they get:
• Credit. Screen credit, imdb credit, as well as school credit if the schools is OK with it.
• Knowledge. Learning first hand what needs to be done on a set.
• Contacts. A person who shows up and kicks butt will always be remembered as a hard worker by those around them, which will eventually lead to actual paying jobs.
• Food and beer. What more does a college aged person need?

Think about it. What are film students doing in their free time anyway? If they're smart they're making their own movies, and no one is paying them to do it. Nor are they paying their classmates who turn out and help them. Well, why not step it up a notch and work on some real movies too. On my last project one of my production coordinators, Yukie (a non-paid student intern, who we are giving Associate Producer credit to), worked hard all day, then would go home when we wrapped and work on the web series she's producing. I have no intention of working on anything without Yukie around ever. She's that good... and I never would have met her if she hadn't been willing to work for free. (By the way, here's a link to her web series, Mythomania).

On my smaller films our interns have actual positions (2nd assistant camera, art director, etc). Some people would be outraged at this, saying that these are positions we should pay to have. But people who say this are the-glass-is-half-empty types. I would think most film students would be thrilled to have a real credit on a real film while they're still in school, or even when they're recently graduated. The two folks in question get to have THE BLACK SWAN on their resumes. How cool would that be?

Of course, some young aspiring filmmakers don't want to work for free, but here's the thing, someone always will. That means that the person who is willing to work for free is the person who ends up with the credit, the knowledge, the contacts and the food and beer. If you're an aspiring film person, and you have the means, then let people know you're willing to work for free for the opportunity to learn. Then when you show up, work your tail off and you'll find yourself rewarded down the road.

Meanwhile I will put Masseurs Glatt and Footman on my "never hire" list.

Here's the article (interesting to read the comments as well).


'Black Swan' Sued for Using Unpaid Interns (Updated)

Published: September 29, 2011 @ 10:33 am


By Brent Lang




(Updated: 11:21 a.m. PST)
Unpaid internships are commonplace in the movie business and considered a necessary step for aspiring filmmakers.
But two former interns on “Black Swan” are striking back at the practice.
They’re suing the Oscar-winning film’s producer Fox Searchlight for violating minimum wage and overtime laws.
Russell Nelson, a spokesman for Fox Searchlight, declined to comment.
The suit was filed in Manhattan federal court on behalf of Alex Footman, a Wesleyan film school graduate, and Eric Glatt, a Case Western Reserve University MBA. Footman served as a production intern and Glatt was employed as an accounting intern.
"Unpaid interns are becoming the modern-day equivalent of entry-level employees, except that employers are not paying them for the many hours they work," the suit reads. "This practice runs afoul of basic wage-and-hour laws."
By relying on unpaid interns to perform production work, the suit says that "Black Swan" was able to keep costs low and improve its profit margins. 
The critically acclaimed film was filmed for $13 million and made nearly $330 million worldwide. 
Glatt and Footman are seeking a jury trial and asking for unpaid wages and attorneys fees. They are also asking the court to discontinue Fox Searchlight's internship practices. 
In the suit Glatt says he worked as much as 50 hours a week for 51 days and was asked to keep track of purchase orders and review personnel files. 
Footman claims he too worked as many as 50 hours a week for 95 days, and was tasked with doing everything from secretarial work to taking out the trash and making coffee. 
The lawsuit argues that the production used unpaid interns to perform “menial tasks” that should have been performed by paid employees.
The suit says that labor rules require that unpaid internships must offer an educational component -- something the “Black Swan” interns say Fox Searchlight failed to provide.
The New York Times first reported the lawsuit.